nmCRPC - Apalutamide vs Enzalutamide vs Darolutamide

nmCRPC - Apalutamide vs Enzalutamide vs Darolutamide

Nieprzeczytany postautor: zosia bluszcz » 26 lut 2022, 22:56

Comparative efficacy of apalutamide darolutamide and enzalutamide for treatment of non-metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis



Highlights

• Apalutamide, darolutamide and enzalutamide outcomes in nonmetastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer patients were compared by network meta-analysis
• Wyniki leczenia apalutamidem, darolutamidem i enzalutamidem u pacjentów z rakiem prostaty opornym na kastrację bez przerzutów zostały porównane za pomocą metaanalizy sieciowej

Enzalutamide and apalutamide had higher metastasis free survival rate than darolutamide.
Enzalutamid i apalutamid miały wyższy wskaźnik przeżycia bez przerzutów niż darolutamid.


• As a class of drugs, second-generation androgen receptor antagonists improve overall survival in nonmetastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer patients.
• Jako klasa leków, antagoniści receptora androgenowego drugiej generacji poprawiają całkowity czas przeżycia u pacjentów z rakiem prostaty bez przerzutów opornych na kastrację.


All medications had comparable adverse event rates, although the probability is lower with Darolutamide.
Wszystkie leki miały porównywalne wskaźniki zdarzeń niepożądanych, chociaż prawdopodobieństwo jest mniejsze w przypadku Darolutamidu.


Abstract

Introduction:
Studies using apalutamide, enzalutamide, or darolutamide have shown improved metastasis free survival (MFS) rates, leaving clinicians with a dilemma of choosing one over the other, for nonmetastatic castration recurrent prostate cancer (nmCRPC). We performed a network meta-analysis to provide an indirect comparison of oncologic outcomes and adverse events (AEs) of these medications.

Material and Methods:
We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and SCOPUS databases, for studies reporting apalutamide, enzalutamide, or darolutamide until January 25, 2020. Results were input into an EndNote library, and data were extracted into a predefined template.
Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as radiologic progression or death. Network meta-analysis was done using R and meta-analysis was performed with RevMan v. 5.
Surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) value was used to provide rank probabilities.

Results:
We found 3 studies reporting results for apalutamide, enzalutamide, and darolutamide.
MFS was significantly lower in patients receiving darolutamide compared to both apalutamide (hazard ratio
: 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55–0.97) and enzalutamide (HR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.54–0.93).
MFS was similar for enzalutamide and apalutamide (HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.73–1.28).
In PFS, apalutamide showed a slightly higher rate compared to darolutamide (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.59–0.99).
There was no difference in overall survival (OS) between any of the medications.
There was no statistically significant difference in AEs profile of the 3 medications.
However, darolutamide had the highest SUCRA value and probability of being the most preferred medication based on AEs profile.

Conclusion:
Enzalutamide and apalutamide had similar and higher MFS rate in indirect comparison with darolutamide.
In cases where AEs are concerning, darolutamide might be the preferred agent.


https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a ... 3920301289
zosia bluszcz
 
Posty: 11382
Rejestracja: 13 cze 2009, 02:06
Blog: Wyświetl blog (0)

Wróć do O CZYM POWINNIŚMY WIEDZIEĆ PRZED, W TRAKCIE I PO LECZENIU

Kto jest online

Użytkownicy przeglądający to forum: Obecnie na forum nie ma żadnego zarejestrowanego użytkownika i 15 gości

logo zenbox